Choose your font:
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Source Sans Pro


[Valid RSS] RSS

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3076 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

Created on : 19 Nov 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Episiotomy and perineal trauma during childbirth. J Adv Nurs. 1989 Apr;14(4):264-8.

Author(s) :

Rockner G, Wahlberg V, Olund A.

Year of publication :


URL(s) :…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

A study was conducted to assess the frequency of episiotomy and spontaneous tears in 807 primiparas during singleton births. The incidence of episiotomy was 50%, spontaneous tears 22% and intact perineum 28%. A significantly lower frequency of episiotomy (P less than 0.001) as well as epidural anaesthesia (P less than 0.001) was found among immigrant women. There were no indications registered for 58% of the episiotomies. The non-episiotomy group experienced more clitoris/labia tears (P less than 0.01). On the other hand there was a tendency towards an increased risk for second and third degree tears, 4.2% in the episiotomy group compared to 1.7% in the non-episiotomy group (P = 0.06). Haemorrhage (greater than 600 ml) was more frequent in the episiotomy group than in the non-episiotomy group (P less than 0.001). We conclude that there is little support for the claim that episiotomy prevents tears in normal deliveries, and that the rationale for the practice of episiotomy is in need of reappraisal.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Il n’y a pas de preuve que l’épisiotomie diminue les déchirures lors d’accouchements "normaux". La pratique des épisiotomies doit donc être remise en question.

Argument (English):

There is little support for the claim that episiotomy prevents tears in normal deliveries, and the rationale for the practice of episiotomy is consequently in need of reappraisal.

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ perineal/vaginal tears ; postpartum hemorrhage ; episiotomy ; epidural

Author of this record :

Sandrine Péneau — 19 Nov 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
➡ Only identified users

 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)


New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact


This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR,
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE,
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase) for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth