Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=1066

Created on : 02 Dec 2004
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Letter. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates. Trials and speaking with patients take time. The British Medical Journal 2004;329:1240.

Author(s) :

Gorincour G.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/74…

Résumé (français)  :

Reponse a l’editorial fiche 904.

Abstract (English)  :

EDITOR—We agree with Anderson that we should have a more comprehensive and frank debate about the ethical issues related to the role of doctors, preferences of patients, and informed consent with respect to caesarean section.1 In response to Minkoff et al,2 we argued that not offering caesarean section was incompatible with the principle of autonomy.3

Particularly in English speaking countries, the historical role of the doctor is changing, thanks to the increasing reliance on a model where the patient is seen as the consumer and the doctor as supplier of services.4 The paternalistic model is still strong in Europe, and the debate about caesarean section may simply reflect today’s difficulties in building a new form of doctor-patient relationship.

Nowadays, trust is not enough for patients: they need proof and evidence. But medicine is both an art and a science, and sometimes there is no clear proof or evidence. Is trust still possible at the very time a major medical liability crisis is happening worldwide?5 Answering this question may be as long, difficult, and important as waiting for the results of any randomised controlled trial.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; ethics ; deontology

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 02 Dec 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth