Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3053 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=1069

Created on : 02 Dec 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Letter. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Delayed cord clamping used to be taught and practised. The British Medical Journal 2004;329:1287.

Author(s) :

Hutchon DJR.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/74…

Résumé (français)  :

Reponse a l’article fiche 1070.

Abstract (English)  :

EDITOR—Tucker and McGuire point out that modern perinatal care and the specific interventions of antenatal steroids and exogenous surfactant have contributed to the improved outcomes for very preterm infants.1 As an obstetric registrar in Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, in the mid-1970s I was taught and practised delayed cord clamping at delivery of preterm infants. This measure has since been shown to reduce the severity of respiratory distress syndrome2 and neonatal morbidity.3 Despite the evidence of benefit, timing of clamping the cord was not included in the 27/28 week inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy (CESDI) project as a standard of care.4 A recent postal survey of obstetricians regularly delivering preterm infants showed that only 47% practised delayed cord clamping.5 Neither is this measure specified by Tucker and Mcguire in their review article.

I agree that prevention of preterm birth, or the need for it, provided by an adequate research based treatment, must be the ultimate aim. When prevention is not possible, every measure that reduces the morbidity and mortality of the infant must be given. Currently this does not seem to be the case in the United Kingdom.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ pathologies of newborn ; morbidity ; premature baby ; guidelines ; newborn care ; informed consent

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 02 Dec 2004
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 02 Dec 2007

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth