Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3032 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=1123

Created on : 01 Apr 2005
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

The relationship between the parturient’s positions and perceptions of labor pain intensity. Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):47-51.

Author(s) :

Adachi K, Shimada M, Usui A.

Year of publication :

2003

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

BACKGROUND: While the effect of the maternal position on reducing labor pain has been studied, the data presented to date have not been conclusive.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if maternal position reduced the intensity of labor pain during cervical dilatation from 6 to 8 centimeters.

METHOD: Pain intensity was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) on 39 primiparous and 19 multiparous women (N = 58) who alternately assumed the sitting and supine positions for 15 minutes during cervical dilatation from 6 to 8 centimeters.

RESULTS: The pain scores for the sitting position were significantly lower than those for the supine position. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test showed the VAS scores for the (a) total labor pain ("total" being defined as both abdominal and lumbar pain) during contraction (p =.011), (b) continuous total labor pain (p =.001), (c) lumbar pain during contraction (p <.001), and (d) continuous lumbar pain (p <.001) in the sitting position (significantly lower than in supine position). The diminished pain scores were greater than 13 millimeters, which is the minimum clinically significant change in patient pain severity as measured with the 100 millimeter VAS. The largest decrease occurred in lower back pain. No significant differences were found for abdominal pain scores in either the sitting or supine positions.

CONCLUSION: The sitting position offers an effective method to relieve lower back labor pain during cervical dilatation from 6 to 8 centimeters. Similar relief was experienced for women who reported pain only on contraction as well as those with continuous pain.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Moins de douleur en position assise par rapport à la position sur le dos.

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; position during labor ; physiology ; pain

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 01 Apr 2005

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth