Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=1177

Created on : 21 Apr 2005
Modified on : 25 Nov 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

The birthing chair in the second stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;25(1):65-8.

Author(s) :

Liddell HS, Fisher PR.

Year of publication :

1985

URL(s) :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3862405
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1985.tb00607.x

Résumé (français)  :

Etude prospective sur 56 primigestes pour évaluer les avantages, les inconvénients et l’acceptabilité de la position verticale pendant le second stade du travail. 37 patientes ont passé le second stade dans une chaise obstétricale en position verticale. 21 étaient en position couchée sur un lit (groupe de contrôle). On n’a pas trouvé de différence pour la durée du second stade ni les difficultés d’accouchement (?) [ease of delivery] entre les deux groupes. Pas de différences détectée en ce qui concerne les conditions du nouveau-né entre les deux groupes. La plupart des patientes qui ont utilisé la chaise obstétricale pensent qu’elle constitue un mode d’accouchement acceptable.

Abstract (English)  :

A prospective study of 56 primigravidas was performed to assess the advantages, disadvantages and acceptability of the upright posture during the second stage of labour. Twenty-seven patients laboured in the second stage in a birthing chair, in an upright position. Twenty-one patients laboured in bed in the recumbent position and acted as controls. No difference could be found in the length of second stage, ease or type of delivery between the 2 groups. No differences were detected in the condition of the neonates between the 2 groups. This birthing chair was found to be an acceptable mode of delivery to most of those patients using it.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Pas de différence entre la chaise obstétricale et le lit concernant la durée du 2° stade, la facilité de l’’accouchement et l’état néonatal. La chaise bien acceptée par les parturientes.

Argument (English):

No difference between obstetric chair and bed regarding duration of stage 2, ease of delivery and neonatal status. The chair is well accepted by the parturients.

Argumento (português):

Nenhuma diferença entre cadeira obstétrica e leito em relação à duração do estágio 2, facilidade de parto e estado neonatal. A cadeira é bem aceita pelas parturientes.

Keywords :

➡ alternative birth ; physiology ; position during labor

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 21 Apr 2005
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 25 Nov 2018

Related records
#1181   McManus TJ, Calder AA. (1978). Upright posture and the efficiency of labour. Lancet. 1978 Jan 14;1(8055):72-4. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1181
Group ‘Discussion of birth chair
#1189Shannahan MD, Cottrell BH. (1985). Effect of the birth chair on duration of second stage labor, fetal outcome, and maternal blood loss. Nurs Res. 1985 Mar-Apr;34(2):89-92. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1189
#1162   Marttila M, Kajanoja P, Ylikorkala O. (1983). Maternal half-sitting position in the second stage of labor. J Perinat Med. 1983;11(6):286-9. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1162
#1158   Stewart P, Hillan E, Calder AA. (1983). A randomised trial to evaluate the use of a birth chair for delivery. Lancet. 1983 Jun 11;1(8337):1296-8. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1158
------ out of group ------
Pinned by #1099   Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ. (2004). Position for women during second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002006. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1099
Pinned by #1209   Radkey AL, Liston RM, Scott KE, Young C. (1991). Squatting: Preventive medicine in childbirth ? Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada 1991;Toronto, Ontario, Canada:76. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1209
Pinned by #2042   Vendittelli F. (1998). Position allongée ou verticale durant le 2e stade du travail : revue des méta-analyses. 28e Journées de la Société française de Médecine Périnatale, Arnette Ed., Paris, 1998, 167-176. ➡ https://afar.info/id=2042
Group ‘Discussion of birth chair
Pinned by #975   Crowley P, Elbourne D, Ashurst H, Garcia J, Murphy D, Duignan N. (1991). Delivery in an obstetric birth chair: a randomized controlled trial. Br-J-Obstet-Gynaecol. 1991 Jul; 98(7): 667-74 ➡ https://afar.info/id=975
Pinned by #1113   SZ Chen, K Aisaka, H Mori, and T Kigawa (1987). Effects of sitting position on uterine activity during labor Obstetrics & Gynecology 69:67-73 ➡ https://afar.info/id=1113
Pinned by #1163   Turner MJ, Romney ML, Webb JB, Gordon H. (1986). The Birthing Chair: an obstetric hazard? J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth 1986;6:232-5. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1163
Pinned by #1165   Waldenstrom U, Gottvall K. (1991). A randomized trial of birthing stool or conventional semirecumbent position for second-stage labor. Birth. 1991 Mar;18(1):5-10. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1165
Pinned by #1175   Hemminki E, Virkkunen A, Makela A, et al. (1986). A trial of delivery in a birth chair. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1986;6:162-5. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1175
Pinned by #1176   Kafka M, Riss P, von Trotsenburg M, Maly Z. (1994). Gebärhocker - ein geburtshilfliches Risiko? [The birthing stool--an obstetrical risk?] [Article in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1994 Sep;54(9):529-31. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1176
Pinned by #1193   Stewart P, Spiby H. (1989). A randomized study of the sitting position for delivery using a newly designed obstetric chair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Mar;96(3):327-33. ➡ https://afar.info/id=1193
Pinned by #1317   Racinet, Claude (2005). Positions maternelles pour l’accouchement. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Jul-Aug;33(7-8):533-8 ➡ https://afar.info/id=1317
Pinned by #3032   Li Thies-Lagergren (2013). The Swedish Birth Seat Trial. Thesis. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. ➡ https://afar.info/id=3032
Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth