Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=1378

Created on : 19 Jan 2006
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY 103 (4): 313-318 APR 1996

Author(s) :

Cammu H, vanEeckhout E

Year of publication :

1996

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: To compare routine amniotomy and early intravenous oxytocin (active management of labour) with a more selective use of amniotomy and oxytocin in women in true labour who received comparable continuous supportive midwifery care.

DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial of nulliparous clinic patients in spontaneous labour at term.

SETTING Labour and delivery ward of a university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and six parturients: 152 received active management of labour; 154 were more selectively managed.

INTERVENTIONS: 1. Active management: early amniotomy, early use of oxytocin. 2. Selective intervention management: no routine amniotomy and more selective use of oxytocin.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of oxytocin and amniotomy. Labour duration, mode of delivery.

RESULTS: Maternal characteristics were comparable in both groups. Amniotomy was more often performed (91% versus 57%, P < 0.01) and oxytocin more often used (53% versus 27%, P <0.01) in the active management group. The first stage of labour, however, was only shortened by half an hour in the active management group (254 min versus 283 min, P = 0.087). Caesarean section rate (3.9% versus 2.6%), spontaneous vaginal delivery rate (78% versus 79%) and neonatal outcome were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION: Within a set-up of strict labour diagnosis and supportive midwifery care, routine amniotomy and early use of oxytocin offered no advantage over a more selective use of amniotomy and oxytocin in terms of mode of delivery and labour duration.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

L’amniotomie de routine et l’utilisation précoce d’ocytocines n’offre aucun avantage par rapport a une utilisation plus selective en terme de délivrance et de durée du travail.
Routine amniotomy and early use of oxytocin offered no advantage over a more selective use of amniotomy and oxytocin in terms of mode of delivery and labour duration.

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ amniotomy ; oxytocin ; active management of labor

Author of this record :

Sandrine Péneau — 19 Jan 2006

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth