Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3109 records
➡ YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2014

Created on : 17 Mar 2007
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

➡ Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial. {Royaume Uni}. Lancet. 1975 Apr 5;1(7910):767-70.

Author(s) :

Cole RA, Howie PW, Macnaughton MC.

Year of publication :

1975

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

In a prospective, randomised trial, 111 obstetrically normal pregnant women, who had elective induction of labour performed between 39 and 40 weeks, were compared with 117 controls who were managed expectantly until 41 weeks. Compared with the controls, the patients who had elective induction of labour had significantly less meconium staining in labour and a smaller blood-loss after delivery. The mean length of labour, the amount of pethidine used, and the Apgar scores at 1 minute were similar in the two groups. In the electively induced group, the caesarean-section rate was lower and the use of epidural analgesia more common than in the controls, but the differences were mot statistically signficant. The hour of delivery was similar in the two groups, suggesting that convenience to medical and nursing staff would not be greatly changed by elective induction of labour. There was no evidence that the hazards to mother and child were increased by elective induction, and its use might improve perinatal mortality by reducing the number of unexplained mature stillbirths.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; post-term pregnancy

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 17 Mar 2007