Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3046 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=2052

Created on : 02 Jun 2007
Modified on : 09 Jan 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Severe early onset pre-eclampsia: prognostic value of ultrasound and Doppler assessment. {Afrique du Sud}. Journal of Perinatology (2007) 27, 335–342.

Author(s) :

Geerts L, Odendaal HJ.

Year of publication :

2007

URL(s) :

http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v27/n6/abs/721174…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Objective:

Assess the prognostic value of ultrasound and Doppler parameters in severe preterm pre-eclampsia.
Study design:

Prospective cohort study in Cape Town, South Africa, involving 113 women with severe pre-eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation and managed expectantly when suitable. Serial ultrasound and multivessel Doppler assessments were performed 2 to 3 times weekly. Observations included fetal weight estimation, growth pattern, amniotic fluid volume, appearance of the heart and bowel, pulsatility index of the uterine, umbilical and middle cerebral arteries and ductus venosus. Perinatal outcome (death or neurological compromise, n=12) and major morbidity (n=62) were related to findings at recruitment and on the last assessment preceding delivery.

Results:

In univariate analysis, fetal growth asymmetry and waveform analysis of all three fetal vessels significantly correlated with both end points. The initial fetal weight estimation with a cutoff weight of 1080 g had the highest sensitivity (83.3%) and negative predictive value (97.5%) for poor outcome (P0.001) while the final ductus venosus pulsatility index had the highest specificity (92%) and positive predictive value (33%). The combination of a raised placentocerebral ratio and ductus venosus pulsatility index close to delivery had the highest (57.1%) positive predictive value. Logistic regression showed the best overall predictive model for poor outcome to be a combination of initial fetal weight estimation and final ductus venosus pulsatility index (overall accuracy 94.6%, RR 20.20 (7.36, 55.41)). The initial fetal weight estimation with a cutoff weight of 1283 g provided the best correct prediction of major morbidity (83.2% overall accuracy, sensitivity 79.0%, specificity 88.2%, positive and negative predictive values of 89.1 and 77.6% respectively). This was better than using the gestational age at recruitment or delivery, birth weight or any of the Doppler results. The prediction of morbidity was not improved by the addition of any other variable in logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion:

For the short-term outcome measures assessed in this study, the estimated fetal weight at the time of diagnosis is the most important prognostic factor in severe pre-eclampsia with some additional value of ductus venosus assessment.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ ultrasound scanning ; eclampsia (pre-)

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 02 Jun 2007
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 09 Jan 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth