Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2470

Created on : 02 Aug 2014
Modified on : 01 Nov 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

A Comparison of the “Hands-Off” and “Hands-On” Methods to Reduce Perineal Lacerations: A Randomised Clinical Trial - The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India - ISBN: 0971-9202, 0975-6434 - p.1-5

Author(s) :

Rezaei, Rozita; Saatsaz, Sussan; Chan, Yiong Huak; Nia, Hamid Sharif

Year of publication :

2014

URL(s) :

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13224-01…
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0535-2

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Objective
The objective of the current study was to compare the “Hands-off” and “Hands-on” methods to reduce perineal lacerations.

Method
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for perineum protection during spontaneous delivery. Study participants included 600 nulliparous expectant mothers, who were divided equally between the “hands off” and “hands on” groups (n_300 per group).

Findings
A total of 147 (49 %) women in the “Hands-on” and 143 women (47.7 %) in the “Hand -off” groups encountered perineal trauma (p = 0.74). In the “Hands-on” group, 8 women (2.7 %) experienced a third degree trauma compared with (0.3 %) that in the “Hands-off” method (p = 0.1). Episiotomy was performed on 38 women (12.7 %) from the “Hands-on” and 17 (5.7 %) women from the “Hands-off” (p = 0.003) groups. In addition, 28 women (9.3 %) from the “Hands-on” group and 47 women (15.7 %) from the “Hands-off” group experienced periurethral tears (p = 0.01) that did not need mending.

Conclusion
Application of the “Hands-off” method for vaginal delivery has a positive effect on the mother’s health because of the reduction of episiotomy and third degree tearing. Therefore, we conclude that the “Hands-off” method offers a safer alternative for perineal control during labor.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

L’application de la méthode dite des « mains libres » lors de l’accouchement vaginal a un effet positif sur la santé de la mère en raison de la réduction de l’épisiotomie et des déchirures du troisième degré. Par conséquent, nous concluons que la méthode « mains libres » offre une alternative plus sûre pour le contrôle périnéal pendant le travail.

Argument (English):

Application of the “Hands-off” method for vaginal delivery has a positive effect on the mother’s health because of the reduction of episiotomy and third degree tearing. Therefore, we conclude that the “Hands-off” method offers a safer alternative for perineal control during labor.

Argumento (português):

A aplicação do método “Hands-off” para o parto vaginal tem um efeito positivo na saúde da mãe, devido à redução da episiotomia e do terceiro grau de dilaceração. Portanto, concluímos que o método “Hands-off” oferece uma alternativa mais segura para o controle perineal durante o trabalho de parto.

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ guidelines ; obstetric and gynecologic violence obstetric violence, obstetrical violence ; episiotomy ; deontology ; informed consent

Author of this record :

Import 02/08/2014 — 02 Aug 2014
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 01 Nov 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth