Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2503

Created on : 02 Aug 2014
Modified on : 02 Aug 2014

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Perineal injury in nulliparous women giving birth at a community hospital: reduced risk in births attended by certified nurse-midwives - Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health - Vol. 55, 3 - ISBN: 1542-2011 - p.243-249

Author(s) :

Browne, Maureen; Jacobs, Mark; Lahiff, Maureen; Miller, Suellen

Year of publication :

2010

URL(s) :


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.11.006

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to determine if there is a difference in rates of perineal injury sustained by nulliparous women attended by obstetricians compared with certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) at a US community hospital.
METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data for 2819 women who spontaneously gave birth to singleton, vertex, term, live infants between 2000 and 2005. The independent variable was attendant type (obstetrician or CNM). The main outcome variables were intact perineum, episiotomy, and spontaneous perineal lacerations. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for six potential confounders: macrosomia, maternal age, epidural anesthesia, oxytocin administration, medical insurance status, and ethnicity.
RESULTS: The odds ratios (ORs) for obstetrician-attended births versus CNM-attended births were significant for a spontaneous minor perineal laceration versus intact perineum (OR = 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.48), spontaneous major laceration versus intact perineum (OR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.13-4.66), and episiotomy use versus no perineal injury, with or without extension (OR = 2.94; 95% CI, 2.01-4.29).
DISCUSSION: We found that the prevalence and severity of perineal injury, both spontaneous and from episiotomy use, were significantly lower in CNM-attended births.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ episiotomy

Author of this record :

Import 02/08/2014 — 02 Aug 2014

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth