Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3046 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=2760

Created on : 26 Nov 2017
Modified on : 26 Nov 2017

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Vol. 129, 3 - p.193-198

Author(s) :

Chen, W.; Xue, J.; Gaudet, L.; Walker, M.; Wen, S.W.

Year of publication :

2015

URL(s) :

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.005

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Background The effectiveness of Foley catheter plus misoprostol for cervical ripening has not been convincingly shown in trials. Objectives To summarize the evidence comparing Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. Search strategy Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Collaboration databases were searched with the terms “Foley catheter,“ “misoprostol,“ “cervical ripening,“ and “labor induction.“ Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials comparing the methods of cervical ripening for delivery of a viable fetus were included. Data collection and analysis Study characteristics, quality, and outcomes were recorded. Random-effects models were used to combine data. Main results Eight trials were included, with 1153 patients overall. In a pooled analysis of seven high-quality studies, the combination group had a decreased time to delivery (mean difference -2.36 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.07 to -0.66; P = 0.007). Risk of chorioamnionitis was significantly increased in the combination group (risk ratio [RR] 2.07, 95% CI 1.04-4.13; P = 0.04), and that of tachysystole with fetal heart rate changes was decreased (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.91; P = 0.02). Frequency of cesarean did not differ (P = 0.77). Conclusions The combined use of Foley catheter and misoprostol results in a reduced time to delivery, a reduced frequency tachysystole with fetal heart rate changes, and an increased incidence of chorioamnionitis. © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ induction of labor ; ripening of cervix ; misoprostol (Cytotec)

Author of this record :

Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 26 Nov 2017

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth