Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3059 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=2809

Created on : 26 Nov 2017
Modified on : 26 Nov 2017

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction in premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of pregnancy - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics - Vol. 130, 3 - p.214-218

Author(s) :

Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Xie, C.; Xiao, M.; Ren, L.

Year of publication :

2015

URL(s) :

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.031

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Abstract Background Both misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel are used for labor induction in women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Objectives To evaluate studies comparing the effects of misoprostol and PGE2 gel in labor induction. Search strategy Databases including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant papers. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of misoprostol and PGE2 gel for labor induction in women with PROM were included. Data collection and analysis For meta-analyses, the Mantel-Haenszel method was used for dichotomous data, and the inverse variance method was used for continuous data. Main results Four randomized controlled studies (n = 615) were included. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the induction-to-delivery interval (mean difference - 4.44 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.35 to 0.48), rate of cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.44-1.85), and rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.57-1.38). Women receiving misoprostol had a significantly higher rate of tachysystole than did those receiving PGE2 gel (OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.46-9.54). Conclusions Misoprostol is as efficacious and safe as PGE2 gel for labor induction in women with PROM. © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ induction of labor ; misoprostol (Cytotec)

Author of this record :

Import 26/11/2017 — 26 Nov 2017

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth