Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2880

Created on : 08 Jan 2018
Modified on : 11 Jan 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Controlled cord traction for the third stage of labour

Author(s) :

Hofmeyr GJ, Mshweshwe NT, Gülmezoglu AM

Year of publication :

2015

URL(s) :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25631379
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008020.pub2

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

CCT has the advantage of reducing the risk of manual removal of the placenta in some circumstances, and evidence suggests that CCT can be routinely offered during the third stage of labour, provided the birth attendant has the necessary skills. CCT should remain a core competence of skilled birth attendants. However, the limited benefits of CCT in terms of severe PPH would not justify the major investment which would be needed to provide training in CCT skills for birth attendants who do not have formal training. Women who prefer a less interventional approach to management of the third stage of labour can be reassured that when a uterotonic agent is used, routine use of CCT can be omitted from the ’active management’ package without increased risk of severe PPH [post-partum hemorragia], but that the risk of manual removal of the placenta may be increased. Research gaps include the use of CCT in the absence of a uterotonic, and the place of uterine massage in the management of the third stage of labour.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

The limited benefits of controlled cord traction (CCT) in terms of severe post-partum hemorragia would not justify the major investment which would be needed to provide training in CCT skills for birth attendants who do not have formal training.

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ midwifery training ; iatrogeny ; guidelines ; 3rd stage of labor ; postpartum hemorrhage ; midwife ; informed consent

Author of this record :

Alison Passieux — 08 Jan 2018
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 11 Jan 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth