Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3032 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=2985

Created on : 18 Aug 2018
Modified on : 18 Aug 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes two years after Caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomized trial. BJOG

Author(s) :

Eileen K Hutton, Mary E Hannah, Andrew R Willan, Susan Ross, Alexander C Allen, B Anthony Armson, Amiram Gafni, KS Joseph, Kathryn Mangoff, Arne Ohlsson, J Johanna Sanchez, Elizabeth V Asztalos, Jon FR Barrett

Year of publication :

2018

URL(s) :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007113
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15407

Résumé (français)  :

Chez les femmes ayant une grossesse gémellaire et sans antécédents d’incontinence urinaire à l’effort, une stratégie de prise en charge via une césarienne programmée par rapport à l’accouchement vaginal réduit le risque d’incontinence urinaire à l’effort deux ans après l’accouchement. Nos résultats montrent que la prévalence mais non la gravité de l’incontinence urinaire à l’effort était associée au mode d’accouchement.

Abstract (English)  :

Does planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth lower the risk of problematic urinary stress, fecal or flatal incontinence?.

DESIGN:
Women between 32 0/7 and 38 6/7 weeks gestation with twin pregnancy were randomised to planned caesarean or planned vaginal birth.

SETTING:
106 centers in 25 countries.

POPULATION:
2305 /2804 enrolled in the study completed questionnaires at two years (82.2%follow up): 1155 in the planned caesarean group, 1150 in the planned vaginal birth group.

METHODS:
A structured self-administered questionnaire two years postpartum.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
The primary maternal outcome and a secondary outcome of the Twin Birth Study was problematic urinary stress incontinence, or fecal, or flatal incontinence at two years.

RESULTS:
Women in the planned caesarean group had lower problematic urinary stress incontinence rates compared with women in the planned vaginal birth group (93/1147 [8.11%] vs 140/1143 [12.25%], odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.83; p=0.001). Among those with problematic urinary stress incontinence, quality of life (measured by IIQ-7) was not different for planned caesarean vs planned vaginal birth groups (mean [SD]: 18.4 [21.0] vs 19.1 [21.5], p=0.82). There were no differences in problematic fecal or flatal incontinence or other maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:
Among women with twin pregnancy and no prior history of urinary stress incontinence, a management strategy of planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth reduces risk of problematic urinary stress incontinence at two years postpartum. Our findings show that prevalence but not severity of urinary stress incontinence was associated with mode of birth.

Sumário (português)  :

Full text (private) :

 ➡ Access requires authorization

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; incontinence/prolapsus

Author of this record :

Alison Passieux — 18 Aug 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth