Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3032 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=400

Created on : 22 Jan 2004
Modified on : 25 Jun 2018

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Oral misoprostol for the third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2003;101(5):921-928.

Author(s) :

Eray Ali Kan, Dilbaz B, Meydanli MM, Öztürk N, Narin MA, Haberal A.

Year of publication :

2003

URL(s) :

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE : To compare oral misoprostol with conventional oxytocics in the management of the third stage of labor.

METHODS : In a controlled trial, 1574 women were randomized into four groups, as follows: Group 1 received intravenous infusion of oxytocin 10 IU plus oral misoprostol 400 microg, followed by two doses of oral misoprostol 100 microg 4 hours apart; group 2 received oral misoprostol 400 microg, followed by two doses of oral misoprostol 100 microg 4 hours apart; group 3 received intravenous infusion of oxytocin 10 IU; and group 4 received intravenous infusion of oxytocin 10 IU plus intramuscular administration of methylergonovine maleate (Methergine) 0.2 mg. The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and decrease in hemoglobin concentration from before delivery to 24 hours postpartum were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS : The primary outcome measures were similar in groups 2 and 3. The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was 9% in group 2, compared with 3.2% in group 1 and 3.5% in group 4 (P < .01, and P = .01, respectively). There were no significant differences among the four groups regarding hemoglobin concentrations. Significantly more women needed additional oxytocin in group 2, when compared with group 4 (5.9% versus 2.2%; P = .01). The proportion of women requiring additional methylergonovine maleate was 4.8% in group 2, compared with 0.7% in group 1 and 1% in group 4 (P < .01 and P = .01, respectively).

CONCLUSION : Oral misoprostol alone is as effective as oxytocin alone for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage; it is less effective than oxytocin plus methylergonovine maleate and oral misoprostol plus oxytocin.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Comparaison entre l’utilisation de misoprostol par voie orale et celle d’ocytociques conventionnels. (Essai randomisé sur 1574 patientes) Le groupe qui n’a reçu que du misoprostol par voie orale a fait 9% d’hémorragies post-partum, contre 3% pour d’autres groupes ayant reçu de l’ocytocine en intraveineuse.

Argument (English):

Comparison between the use of oral misoprostol and that of conventional oxytocics. (Randomized trial of 1574 patients) The group receiving only oral misoprostol had 9% postpartum haemorrhage, compared with 3% for other groups who received oxytocin intravenously.

Argumento (português):

Comparação entre o uso de misoprostol por via oral e o uso de ocitócicos convencionais (Ensaio randomizado de 1574 pacientes) O grupo que recebeu apenas misoprostol oral teve 9% de hemorragia pós-parto, em comparação com 3% para outros grupos que receberam ocitocina por via intravenosa.

Keywords :

➡ duration of labour ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; active management of labor ; oxytocin ; postpartum hemorrhage ; hormones ; misoprostol (Cytotec) ; induction of labor

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 22 Jan 2004
➡ latest update : Bernard Bel — 25 Jun 2018

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth