Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=42

Created on : 14 Jul 2003
Modified on : 01 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Easy

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretive review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet. Gynecol. Survey 1983, 38(6): 322-338

Author(s) :

Thacker, SB.; Banta, HD.

Year of publication :

1983

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?c…

Résumé (français)  :

Les auteurs ont étudié plus de 350 articles, rapports et chapitres d’ouvrages publiés de 1860 à 1980, et n’ont trouvé aucune preuve substantielle que l’épisiotomie empêcherait les déchirures dans le rectum, les dommages à la paroi pelvienne, les traumatismes à la tête du foetus, ni que les épisiotomies étaient plus faciles à réparer que les déchirures.

[Résumé tiré de Goer, H. Obstetric Myths Versus Research Realities: A Guide to the Medical Literature. Westport: Bergin & Garvey, 1995: 280-281]

Abstract (English)  :

The benefits and risks of episiotomy in labor and delivery as recorded in the English language literature in over 350 books and articles published since 1860 are reviewed and analyzed. Episiotomy is performed in over 60 per cent of all deliveries in the United States and in a much higher per cent of primigravidas. Yet, there is no clearly defined evidence for its efficacy, particularly for routine use. In addition, although poorly studied, there is evidence that postpartum pain and discomfort are accentuated after episiotomy, and serious complications, including maternal death, can be associated with the procedure. Therefore, carefully designed controlled trials of benefit and risk should be carried out on the use of episiotomy.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Resume en anglais rajoute par C. Loup, tq publie.

Argument (français) :

Revue de la littérature jusqu’en 1980

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ survey ; perineal/vaginal tears ; episiotomy

Author of this record :

Bernard Bel — 14 Jul 2003

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth