Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
Currently 3053 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=596

Created on : 10 Mar 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

[Advantages and risk of a trial of vaginal delivery in the scarred uterus] Tunis Med. 2003 Aug;81(8):563-6.

Author(s) :

Ben AN, Sadfi A, Gara F.

Year of publication :

2003

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

We present a retrospective study of 1235 deliveries in scarred uterus. The aim of this study is to analyse the materno-fetal mortality and morbidity after caesarean section and a trial vaginal delivery. Uterine challenge has been tried is 578 cases with success in 12.14%. The global rate of real uterine rupture is 1.3% and of scare opening is 3.16%. The trial vaginal birth was complicated by uterine rupture in 5.9% versus 2.89% in planned caesarean section. (P = 0.00967). The length of hospitalization, the number of blood transfusion and the rate of puerperal infections are lower in the vaginal delivery trial group. The rate of new-born with Apgar < 7 in the 5th minute is in a significative way, lower in the iterative caesarean section group. (2.58% versus 4.67%), (P = 0.048). In the other hand, uterine rupture rate as well as fetal distress rate are higher in case of failure of the vaginal delivery. Maternal and fetal complications are rare and seem to be more frequent in case of failure of the uterine challenge. Accurate analysis of different obstetrical situations is necessary in order to predict the success or the failure of the vaginal delivery trial. It may lessen the maternal and fetal morbidity.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ c-section/caesarean ; morbidity

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 10 Mar 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth