Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=634

Created on : 13 Apr 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

The usefulness of glycosuria and the influence of maternal blood pressure in screening for gestational diabetes. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;113(2):145-148.

Author(s) :

Buhling KJ, Elze L, Henrich W, Starr E, Stein U, Siebert G, Dudenhausen J.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T69…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: Although gestational diabetes is among the most common diseases arising during pregnancy, glucose stix is the only screening test to date in Germany. Our goal was to evaluate the sensitivity of the glucose-stix for diabetes screening and the possible influence of other parameters.
METHODS: 1001 patients who underwent the 50 g glucose screening test between June 1, 1997 and January 5, 2000 as part of prenatal care were asked to participate. In accordance with the guidelines of the American Diabetes Association, patients with a screening test result140 mg/dl underwent a oral glucose tolerance test (Carpenter/Coustan criteria). A urine sample was collected prior to the test. The glucose content of the urine was semiquantitatively analyzed using a test strip (Multistix 10 SG® Bayer®, Munich, Germany). Blood pressure was measured in 349 consecutive cases according to the criteria of the National Institute of Health. RESULTS: The overall frequency of gestational diabetes was 4.1% (37/912). 8.2% of the women presented with glycosuria (82/1001, 36 before screening, 46 based on the pregnancy medical records booklet). 30/82 (37%) of these patients had a pathological screening test (P=0.029). 7.1% (52/729) of the healthy patients and 10.8% (4/37) of the gestational diabetics had glycosuria at least once. Therefore, the sensitivity of glycosuria is 10.8%, the positive predictive value is 6.6%. The systolic blood pressure was 116±12 mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure 72±9 mmHg. Three of 349 (0.9%) patients were documented with preexisting hypertension, 14/349 (4.0%) patients with "pregnancy induced hypertension". Patients with glycosuria were both significantly more advanced in gestational age (34.4±2.8 versus 33.7±2.9, P=0.009) and had higher diastolic blood pressure (79±9 versus 71±9, P=0.005). The 50 g glucose screening test results showed only a tendency to differ (131±23 versus 127±24, P=0.073). A multivariate analysis of these factors showed a significant influence of the diastolic blood pressure (P=0.016) and the 50 g glucose screening test (P=0.032), whereas the gestational week had no influence (P=0.673).
CONCLUSIONS: Urine glucose dip stick analysis is not useful in the detection of gestational diabetes because of its low sensitivity and negative predictive value. Our study suggests that glycosuria is not only dependent on the blood glucose level, but highly influenced by diastolic blood pressure. The results clearly underscore the need for standardized, routine testing of every pregnant woman.

Sumário (português)  :

Comments :

Conclusion qui parait bien peremptoire vu la fragilite de la mesure : difference
sur la diastolique a tout juste 1 sigma donc aucune valeur statistique, et comparaison avec une moyenne qui elle comprend tous les ages gestationnels.
Une analyse multivariable est mentionnee, mais tout de meme, moins d’1 sigma
c’est pas convaincant.

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; screening ; gestational diabetes

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 13 Apr 2004

Discussion (display only in English)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms (read guidelines)

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) or joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE).
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth