Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 English 
 Français 
 Português 
 Español 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - (CIANE)

Description of this bibliographical database (CIANE website)
Currently 3108 records
YouTube channel (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=823

Created on : 30 Jun 2004
Modified on : 02 Dec 2007

 Modify this record
Do not follow this link unless you know an editor’s password!


Share: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Hard

Bibliographical entry (without author) :

Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: when to induce labor? European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2004;115(1):23-27.

Author(s) :

Ezra Y, Michaelson-Cohen R, Abramov Y, Rojansky N.

Year of publication :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T69…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVES: To determine the significant predictors of clinical chorioamionitis and neonatal infection in patients with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term, and to apply this information to determination of optimal timing of labor induction.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case control series of women at 37 weeks’ with prelabor rupture of the membranes. The study group consisted of women with evidence of maternal or neonatal infection. Controls had no evidence of infection. Three types of management were compared. (1) Immediate induction of labor, (2) expectant management up to 24 h followed by induction of labor if still necessary, or (3) expectant management for over 24 h. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by stepwise logistic regression (SPSS software package). The size of the study and the control groups was calculated for a 90% power with two sided P value of 0.05 in order to demonstrate an odds ratio of 2 for expectant management (two groups: early and late) versus immediate induction of labor (132 and 279 women in the study and the control groups, respectively).

RESULTS: The rate of expectant management for over 24 h versus expectant management until 24 h followed by induction of labor when still necessary, was higher among cases than among controls (OR=1.84; P<0.017; 95% CI, 1.127–3.003). Conversely, the rate of immediate induction of labor versus expectant management until 24 h followed by induction of labor when still necessary, was also higher among cases (OR=2.66; P<0.001; 95% CI, 0.222–0.644).

CONCLUSION: In women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term, the best approach is to induce labor if spontaneous labor has not begun after 24 h.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comments :

Argument (français) :

En cas de rupture spontanée des membranes à terme, la meilleure approche consiste à déclencher si le travail n’a pas débuté spontanément après 24 heures.

Argument (English):

In women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term, the best approach is to induce labor if spontaneous labor has not begun after 24 h.

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Keywords :

➡ evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; physiology ; duration of labour ; induction of labor ; rupture of membranes ; active management of labor ; post-term pregnancy

Author of this record :

Cécile Loup — 30 Jun 2004

Discussion (display all languages)
 
➡ Only identified users



 I have read the guidelines of discussions and I accept all terms
[Hide guidelines]

➡ Discussion guidelines

1) Comments aim at clarifying the content of the publication or suggesting links for a better comprehension of its topic
2) All comments are public and opinions expressed belong to their authors
3) Avoid casual talk and personal stories
4) Any off-topic comment or containing inappropriate statements will be deleted without notice

barre

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database created by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR) is managed
by Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation
(2) or financially supporting CIANE (see below)
(3) or joining any society affiliated with CIANE.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact bibli(arobase)ciane.net for more information.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Donating to CIANE (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth