Base de datos - (CIANE)

Presentación de esta base de datos documental (Sitio web de CIANE)
Actualmente 3109 registros
➡ Canal de YouTube (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=2246

Creado el : 09 Oct 2008
Alterado em : 08 Jan 2018

➡ Editar este registro
¡Sólo siga este enlace si tiene una contraseña de editor!

Ficha bibliográfica (sin autores) :

Home birth: Consumer choice and restriction of physician autonomy Journal of Business Ethics. Volume 6, Number 6 / August, 1987. Pages 481-487

Autores :

Paul Thompson

Año de publicación :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.springerlink.com/content/u1236818w45165…
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383290

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Abstract It is frequently argued that home birth is morally irresponsible because it involves the taking of risks on behalf of the fetus. Against this position, I argue three things. First, the fact that home birth involves risks does not necessarily entail that choosing or attending one is morally unacceptable, irresponsible or wrong. Second, parents have a prima facia prerogative to decide on behalf of their fetuses and children whether risks should be taken. While this prima facia prerogative can be overridden, reasonable and widely accepted criteria for doing so are not met in the case of home birth. Third, since the current attitudes and behaviours of physicians with regard to home birth constitute a de facto morally and socially unjustifiable overriding of an informed parental decision, physician autonomy should be restricted so as to preserve the autonomy of the medical consumer.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Texto completo (private) :

Comentarios :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Palabras claves :

➡ parto en casa

Autor de este registro :

Emmanuelle Phan — 09 Oct 2008
➡ última modificación : Bernard Bel — 08 Jan 2018