Base de datos - (CIANE)

Presentación de esta base de datos documental (Sitio web de CIANE)
Actualmente 3109 registros
➡ Canal de YouTube (tutorial)

https://ciane.net/id=830

Creado el : 08 Jul 2004
Alterado em : 02 Dec 2007

➡ Editar este registro
¡Sólo siga este enlace si tiene una contraseña de editor!

Ficha bibliográfica (sin autores) :

Elective cesarean section. Letters. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004;171(1):13.

Autores :

Fernandes JR.

Año de publicación :

2004

URL(s) :

http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/171/1/13?etoc

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

It was with utter dismay and surprise that I read Mary Hannah’s commentary on planned elective cesarean section.1 Given that there has never been any scientific proof of benefit from unindicated surgery, how can the literature for indicated procedures be used to justify our willingness to acquiesce to the wishes of the consumer? And just because indicated procedures have low rates of complications and appear safe, we should not use those data to bend to current trends in consumerism. Are we physicians so afraid of disappointing the consumer that we are willing to perform unnecessary procedures? I find it rather hypocritical that we misuse and contort the literature to justify this approach and then turn around and call ourselves scientists practising evidenced-based medicine. If we want to practise what amounts to cosmetic surgery, then by all means, let’s do so and bill patients for these services independently.

Sumário (português)  :

Resumen (español)  :

Comentarios :

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Argumento (español):

Palabras claves :

➡ cesárea ; medicina basada en la evidencia ; ética ; ética profesional ; consentimiento informado

Autor de este registro :

Cécile Loup — 08 Jul 2004
➡ última modificación : Bernard Bel — 02 Dec 2007