Base de données - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Présentation de cette base de données documentaires (site de l’AFAR)
Actuellement 3059 fiches
➡ Chaîne YouTube (tutoriel)

https://afar.info/id=1715

Créée le : 01 Feb 2006
Modifiée le : 02 Dec 2007

➡ Modifier cette fiche
Ne suivez ce lien que si vous possédez un mot de passe d’éditeur !

Notice bibliographique (sans auteurs) :

Misoprostol induction of labor among women with a history of cesarean delivery. {USA}. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;184(6):1115-7.

Auteur·e(s) :

Choy-Hee L, Raynor BD.

Année de publication :

2001

URL(s) :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=…

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

OBJECTIVE: Several reports have appeared of uterine rupture among women with a history of cesarean delivery who received misoprostol for induction of labor. A recent review suggested a uterine rupture rate of almost 6%, but the experience at our institution did not seem to reflect this high complication rate. This study was undertaken to compare complications of labor induction with misoprostol between women with a history of cesarean delivery and women without uterine scarring.

STUDY DESIGN: A computerized database was used to select women with a viable fetus who underwent induction of labor with misoprostol during the period from January 1996 through December 1998. Patients were given 50 microg misoprostol every 4 hours. Women with a history of cesarean delivery were retrospectively compared with those without uterine scarring.

RESULTS: A total of 425 women were given misoprostol for induction of labor: 48 had a history of cesarean delivery and 377 did not. Women with a history of cesarean delivery were more likely to be delivered abdominally (56% vs 28%; P <.04). Among women with a history of cesarean delivery, women who had a history of vaginal birth after cesarean were more likely to be delivered vaginally (92% vs 42%; P =.003). There was no difference in the overall rate of complications (2% with scarring vs 3% without scarring). There were no uterine ruptures. However, the previous cesarean group was more likely than the unscarred group to have blood loss >500 mL (38% vs 22%; P <.03). Although the incidences of fetal distress were similar, neonates born to women in the previous cesarean group were more likely to have an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (13% vs 5%; P <.04).

CONCLUSION: Misoprostol induction of labor in women with a history of cesarean resulted in a higher rate of cesarean delivery than was seen among women without uterine scarring but was not associated with a higher incidence of complications. There were no uterine ruptures in either group.

Sumário (português)  :

Remarques :

Fiche importée de http://www.worldserver.com/turk/birthing/rrvbac2000-4.html avec l’aide de Ken Turkowski, septembre 2005

Argument (français) :

Argument (English):

Argumento (português):

Mots-clés :

➡ accouchement vaginal après césarienne ; césarienne ; médecine factuelle ; déclenchement ; détresse foetale ; hémorragie postpartum ; misoprostol (Cytotec) ; dépassement de terme

Auteur·e de cette fiche :

Cécile Loup — 01 Feb 2006