Escolha sua fonte:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro
 Login


 Português 
 Français 
 English 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Banco de dados - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Descrição deste banco de dados documental (Site da AFAR)
Atualmente 3047 fichas
Canal do YouTube (tutorial)

https://afar.info/id=2841

Criado em : 18 Dec 2017
Alterado em : 07 Jan 2018

 Modificar esta ficha
Siga este link somente se você tiver um palavra chave de editor!


Compartilhar: Facebook logo   Tweeter logo   Fácil

Nota bibliográfica (sem autor) :

Women’s motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17:423

Autores :

Martine Hollander, Esteriek de Miranda, Jeroen van Dillen, Irene de Graaf, Frank Vandenbussche and Lianne Holten

Ano de publicação :

2017

URL(s) :

https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/a…
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1621-0

Résumé (français)  :

Abstract (English)  :

Background

Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. Until now there were no qualitative data on women’s motivations for these choices in the Dutch maternity care system where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options in low risk pregnancies. We aimed to examine women’s motivations for birthing outside the system in order to provide medical professionals with insight and recommendations regarding their interactions with women who have birth wishes that go against medical advice.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative research design with a constructivist approach and a grounded theory method were used. In-depth interviews were performed with 28 women on their motivations for going against medical advice in choosing a high risk childbirth setting. Open, axial and selective coding of the interview data was done in order to generate themes. A focus group was held for a member check of the findings.

Results

Four main themes were found: 1) Discrepancy in the definition of superior knowledge, 2) Need for autonomy and trust in the birth process, 3) Conflict during negotiation of the birth plan, and 4) Search for different care. One overarching theme emerged that covered all other themes: Fear. This theme refers both to the participants’ fear (of interventions and negative consequences of their choices) and to the providers’ fear (of a bad outcome). Where for some women it was a positive choice, for the majority of women in this study the choice for a home birth in a high risk pregnancy or an unassisted childbirth was a negative one. Negative choices were due to previous or current negative experiences with maternity care and/or conflict surrounding the birth plan.

Conclusions

The main goal of working with women whose birthing choices do not align with medical advice should not be to coerce them into the framework of protocols and guidelines but to prevent negative choices.

Recommendations for maternity caregivers can be summarized as: 1) Rethink risk discourse, 2) Respect a woman’s trust in the birth process and her autonomous choice, 3) Have a flexible approach to negotiating the birth plan using the model of shared decision making, 4) Be aware of alternative delivery care providers and other sources of information used by women, and 5) Provide maternity care without spreading or using fear.

Sumário (português)  :

Comentários :

Étude qualitative (28 entretiens).
L’objectif principal de travailler avec des femmes dont les choix d’accouchement ne s’alignent pas sur un avis médical ne devrait pas être de les contraindre dans le cadre de protocoles et de lignes directrices mais d’empêcher des choix négatifs.

Argument (français) :

Aux Pays Bas, des femmes dont l’accouchement est considéré comme à risque et à qui on recommande l’hôpital (“High risk childbirth setting“) choisissent quand même un accouchement à domicile ou non assisté. Phénomène en augmentation.

Argument (English):

Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands.
The main goal of working with women whose birthing choices do not align with medical advice should not be to coerce them into the framework of protocols and guidelines but to prevent negative choices.

Argumento (português):

Palavras-chaves :

➡ ética ; lugar de nascimento ; parto domiciliar ; saúde pública

Autor da esta ficha :

Bernard Bel — 18 Dec 2017
➡ última atualização : Bernard Bel — 07 Jan 2018

Discussão (exibir apenas português)
 
➡ Reservado para usuários identificados



 Li a carta de discussões e aceito as condições (leia as diretrizes)

barre

Efectuar uma nova consulta especialista --- Outro pedido simples

Criação de uma ficha --- Importar registros

Gerenciamento de usuários --- Fazer backup do banco de dados --- Contato

bar

Esta base de dados é gerida pela Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
filiados Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, https://ciane.net).
Ele é alimentado pelas contribuições de voluntários interessados ​​em compartilhar informações científicas.
Se você aprovar este projeto, você pode nos ajudar de várias maneiras:
(1) tornar-se um colaborador com base nisso, se você tem um pouco experiência na literatura científica
(2) ou apoio financeiro AFAR (veja abaixo)
(3) ou tornar-se um membro da AFAR (ou outra associação afiliada à CIANE).
Faça login ou crie uma conta para seguir as alterações ou se tornar um editor.
Contato afar.association(arobase)gmail.com para mais informações.

Valid CSS! Valid HTML!
Doar para a AFAR (clique em “Faire un don”) nos ajudará a manter e desenvolver sites e bancos de dados
públicos para o apoio das decisões informadas dos pais e cuidadores com relação ao parto