Choose your font:
 Arimo
 Merriweather
 Mukta Malar
 Open Sans Condensed
 Rokkitt
 Source Sans Pro


 English 
 Français 
 Português 

[Valid RSS] RSS
bar

Database - Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR)

Description of this bibliographical database (AFAR website)
YouTube channel (tutorial)

Search results

Group ‘Discussing induction on term pregnancy

 New expert query

13 records found

 New simple query

ID

Argument

Author(s)

Title

Difficulty - Comments

URL

3074

 Display this record
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks, compared to expectant management beyond that gestational age, was associated with a significantly lower risk of cesarean delivery, maternal peripartum infection, and perinatal adverse outcomes, including respiratory morbidity, intensive care unit admission, and mortality.

William A.Grobman, Aaron B.Caughey (2019)

Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared to expectant management: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; baby’s health ; morbidity

hard

Related records : #2984

https://www.sciencedirect…
https://doi.org/10.1016/j…

2984
PDF
(private)

 Display this record
Induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women did not result in a significantly lower frequency of a composite adverse perinatal outcome, but it did result in a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery.

William A. Grobman, M. D., Madeline M. Rice, Ph. D., Uma M. Reddy, M. D., M. P. H., Alan T. N. Tita, M. D., Ph. D., Robert M. Silver, M. D., Gail Mallett, R. N., M. S., C. C. R. C., Kim Hill, R. N., B. S. N., Elizabeth A. Thom, Ph. D., Yasser Y. El-Sayed, M. D., Annette Perez-Delboy, M. D., Dwight J. Rouse, M. D., George R. Saade, M. D., Kim A. Boggess, M. D., Suneet P. Chauhan, M. D., Jay D. Iams, M. D., Edward K. Chien, M. D., Brian M. Casey, M. D., Ronald S. Gibbs, M. D., Sindhu K. Srinivas, M. D., M. S. C. E., Geeta K. Swamy, M. D., Hyagriv N. Simhan, M. D., and George A. Macones, M. D., M. S. C. E. (2018)

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:513-523  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines

hard

Voir discussion de cette méthodologie sur la page http://ciane.net/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=Ciane.DeclenchementSystematiqueBiais  more…

Related records : #2018 #2070 #2017 #2067 #2010 #3039 #2015 #2064 #3037 #3038 #2069 #3074

https://www.nejm.org/doi/…
https://doi.org/10.1056/N…

3039
PDF
(public)

 Display this record
Grobman et.al. reflects more evidence of research that uses bad methodology to make incorrect recommendations, once again, with the ultimate goal of medicalizing the birth process.

Judy Slome Cohain (2018)

Critique of Grobman etal. and the ARRIVE RCT to induce birth at 39 weeks. Conference: Midwifery Today, September.  Display this record
➡ induction of labor ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; guidelines

hard

Related records : #3037 #2984 #3038 #2017 #2064 #2010 #2018 #2015 #2070 #2067 #2069

https://www.researchgate.…

3038
PDF
(public)

 Display this record
Effectiveness: no difference in terms of cesarean section, result in agreement with the data of the literature. Satisfaction: 1/3d of patients overall not very satisfied or not satisfied with their induction of labour, whatever the method.

Camille Le Ray (2017)

Le déclenchement du travail en France Résultats de l’étude MEDIP (Méthodes de Déclenchement et Issues Périnatales). Etude financée par l’ANSM dans le cadre de l’appel d’offre jeunes chercheurs 2014.  Display this record
➡ induction of labor ; public health ; guidelines

easy

Related records : #2064 #2017 #2015 #2070 #2067 #2018 #2010 #3037 #3039 #2984 #2069

http://www.sfmp.net/le-ra…

3037
PDF
(public)

 Display this record
An overview of the scientific literature on induction of labour at the term of pregnancy suggests that this intervention would be low risk as long as certain conditions are met. However, some methodological biases suggest that this conclusion should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis based on criteria left behind.

Cécile Loup, Emmanuelle Phan, Bernard Bel (2008)

Le déclenchement systématique, une intervention anodine ? Note du CIANE suite aux RPC « Déclenchement artificiel du travail à partir de 37 semaines d’aménorrhée » publiées par la HAS en avril 2008.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines

easy

Related records : #2064 #3039 #2017 #2067 #2018 #3038 #2015 #2010 #2984 #2070 #2069 #2051

https://ciane.net/wiki/pm…

2017
PDF
(public)

 Display this record
Induction of labor at 41 weeks of gestation does not increase the cesarean delivery rate or cause a longer stay in hospital than follow-up until 42 weeks, and neonatal morbidity is also lower after induction.

Gelisen O, Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Ozdas E, Dilbaz B, Ozdas E, Haberal A. (2005)

Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores. {Turquie}. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Jun 1;120(2):164-9.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy ; misoprostol (Cytotec)

hard

Related records : #2984 #2010 #2018 #2067 #2070 #3037 #3038 #2064 #2015 #3039 #2069

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g…

2064
PDF
(public)

 Display this record
Compared with spontaneous onset of labor, medical and elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term with a single fetus in cephalic presentation is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery, predominantly related to an unfavorable Bishop score at admission.

Francis P. J. M. Vrouenraets, MD, Frans J. M. E. Roumen, MD, PhD, Cary J. G. Dehing, BSt, Eline S. A. van den Akker, MD, Maureen J. B. Aarts, MD and Esther J. T. Scheve, MD (2005)

Bishop Score and Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005;105:690-697.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy

hard

Related records : #3037 #2070 #3038 #2017 #2984 #2015 #2067 #2018 #2010 #3039 #2069

http://www.greenjournal.o…

2010
PDF
(private)

 Display this record
RCT. Aucun avantage ni désavantage particulier à déclencher à 41 SA + 3j sur col favorable plutôt que d’attendre en surveillant. Important : la quasi totalité des femmes du groupe expectative avaient accouché dans la semaine suivante.

Chanrachakul B, Herabutya Y. (2003)

Postterm with favorable cervix: is induction necessary ? {Thailande} Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Feb 10;106(2):154-7.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy

hard

Related records : #2984 #2017 #2018 #2070 #2067 #3038 #2015 #3037 #2064 #3039 #2069

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.…

2069
PDF
(public)

 Display this record
The standard of care in Canada now is assumed to be routine induction at 41 weeks. This commentary is intended to give pause to those who have accepted and adopted this standard.

Savas M. Menticoglou, Philip F. Hall (2002)

Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation: nonsensus consensus. BJOG, 2002 May;109(5): 485-491  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; post-term pregnancy

hard

Related records : #2018 #2015 #2070 #2067 #2010 #2017 #2064 #2984 #3037 #3038 #3039

https://obgyn.onlinelibra…
https://doi.org/10.1111/j…

2018
PDF
(private)

 Display this record
It is reasonable to observe uncomplicated pregnancy until 42 weeks with adequate monitoring. After 42 weeks, induction of labor is preferred.

Roach VJ, Rogers MS. (1997)

Pregnancy outcome beyond 41 weeks gestation. {Chine}. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Oct;59(1):19-24.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy

hard

Le résultat aurait été inverse si l’on n’avait compté que les femmes qui ont réellement subi  more…

Related records : #2984 #2070 #2010 #2017 #2067 #2015 #3038 #3037 #2064 #3039 #2069

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g…

2015
PDF
(private)

 Display this record

Goeree R, Hannah M, Hewson S. (1995)

Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian Multicentre Postterm Pregnancy Trial. {Canada}. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1445-50.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy

hard

Related records : #2018 #2984 #3038 #2017 #2064 #2010 #3037 #2067 #2070 #3039 #2069

http://www.pubmedcentral.…

2070

 Display this record
In post-term pregnancy, the induction of labor results in a lower rate of cesarean section than serial antenatal monitoring; the rates of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity are similar with the two approaches to management.

Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A, and the Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. (1992)

Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1587–1592.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; evidence-based medicine/midwifery ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy

hard

Related records : #2984 #2018 #2067 #2010 #2017 #2064 #3038 #3037 #2015 #3039 #2069

http://content.nejm.org/c…
https://doi.org/10.1056/N…

2067
PDF
(private)

 Display this record

Bréart G, Goujard J, Maillard F, Chavigny C, Rumeau-Rouquette C, Sureau C. (1982)

Comparaison de deux attitudes obstétricales vis-à-vis du déclenchement artificiel du travail à terme. Essai randomisé. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1982;11(1):107-112.  Display this record
➡ c-section/caesarean ; induction of labor ; guidelines ; post-term pregnancy
(Other language versions)

hard

481 femmes sont dans le bras “Intention de déclencher“.... 173 ont été effectivement déclenchées.  more…

Related records : #2984 #2070 #2018 #2017 #3037 #2010 #3038 #2015 #2064 #3039 #2069

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g…

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g…

⇑ Top of page ⇑

bar

New expert query --- New simple query

Creating new record --- Importing records

User management --- Dump database --- Contact

bar

This database is managed by Alliance francophone pour l'accouchement respecté (AFAR, https://afar.info)
affiliated with Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance (CIANE, http://ciane.net).
It is fed by the voluntary contributions of persons interested in the sharing of scientific data.
If you agree with this project, you can support us in several ways:
(1) joining the AFAR (or another society affiliated with CIANE)
(2) financially supporting AFAR (see below)
(3) contributing to this database if you have a minimum training in documentation.
Sign in or create an account to follow changes or become an editor.
Contact afar.association(arobase)gmail.com for more information.

Donating to AFAR (click “Faire un don”) will help us to maintain and develop sites and public
databases towards the support of parents and caregivers’ informed decisions with respect to childbirth